The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Coram Deo Conference - click for details
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Biblical and Theological/Why Wouldn’t God Provide More Proof?

Why Wouldn’t God Provide More Proof?

Evidence alone cannot produce faith.

Written by John Beeson | Wednesday, March 4, 2026

Perhaps God is inviting us into something deeper than intellectual assent.…Jesus said, “Truly, I say to you, whoever does not receive the kingdom of God like a child shall not enter it” (Mark 10:15). A child does not demand a technical explanation before trusting a loving father. A child trusts because he knows the father’s character.

 

While the influence of the so-called new atheists, led by Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchins, has waned in recent years, the fog of their critiques against Christianity has not altogether disappeared. Comedian Ricky Gervais has leveled one of the most compelling arguments against Christianity. He argues that if you destroyed all holy books and all science books, “in a thousand years’ time [the holy books] wouldn’t come back just as [they were].” “Whereas if we took every since book, and every fact, and destroyed them all, in a thousand years they’d all be back, because all the same tests would [produce] the same result. they’d all be back.” In other words, the science books would return exactly as they were because experiments would return the same results while the religious texts would not.

Gervais argues that if God were real, he could have easily proven himself by including verifiable scientific knowledge in scripture such as =2. In his view, the “myths” of the Bible are far from persuasive. His point is simple: science is superior to faith because it relies on testability and repeatable evidence, while religion rests on ancient testimony and tradition.

It’s an important critique. Why didn’t God include scientific formulas to prove his existence?

Others set a different bar. The agnostic Alex O’Connor has said that, for him, conversion would require an unmistakable, personal supernatural experience that could not be explained away. Many skeptics probably resonate more with O’Connor than Gervais. Their doubt is personal. They are waiting for an encounter with God that feels undeniable.

But what if both critiques misunderstand the purpose of Scripture? What if God’s goal is not to overwhelm us with irrefutable proof, but to invite us into trust? Scripture suggests that God’s aim is not intellectual coercion but relational trust. “So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ” (Rom. 10:17). The Bible presents God not as a theorem to be solved but as a Person to be known.

Read More

Related Posts:

  • Spiritual Orphans: Forgetting our Heavenly Father
  • What Should We Think about Paedocommunion?
  • “A Fundamentally Decent Religion”
  • “I’m a Cultural Christian”, Says Richard Dawkins
  • Make the West Christian Again?

Subscribe to Free “Top 10 Stories” Email

Get the top 10 stories from The Aquila Report in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Name(Required)

Archives

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Belhaven University
Coram Deo Conference - click for details

Books

Tool Small by Craig Biehl - Why Atheists Can't Know What They Say They Know
Plumbing the Depths of Darkness - click for details
Tim Keller on the Christian Life - by Matt Smethurst
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Books

The Letter of Jude - book from Tulip Publishing
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2026 The Aquila Report · Log in