From the conclusion of our executive report (drawn from the Pastoral Letter): We affirm that only those “who conform to the biblical requirement of chastity and sexual purity in their descriptions of themselves, their convictions, character, and conduct should be considered for leadership.” Additionally, we affirm that “Courts may consider for ordination candidates whose ongoing... Continue Reading

As I listened to the debate, I had an overwhelming sense of déjà vu – that I had seen this all before.  Seventeen years ago, I helped lead my congregation into the EPC to escape from the homosexual agenda that infected the PC(USA). Now, I was witnessing the very same thing in the EPC General... Continue Reading

The AIC has offered no historical witnesses for its cavalier interpretation of Scripture and the Confession and Catechisms; it is because there are no witnesses. For the AIC to suggest that 17th Century Puritans who wrote the Westminster Standards would approve of celibate homosexual ordination is false and preposterous, and they must surely know it.... Continue Reading

The issue posing potential division to this short-lived church and denomination relates to the Ad-Interim Committee recommendations to ordain and receive same sex sexually attracted candidates and pastors who promise to live a chaste life either by celibacy or biblical marriage.   From June 16-18, 2026, the Evangelical Presbyterian Church (EPC) will face a historical... Continue Reading

Why do I raise this issue? Because of a current issue facing the EPC denomination.  Like so many decisions in church history, the current critical issue facing the EPC is a watershed issue. Be assured it doesn’t relate to violence, tortures, or murders.  However, it may and could relate to false teaching, compromise, regarding homosexuality. ... Continue Reading

A leader whose life reflects an ongoing identification with desires that Scripture calls “contrary to nature” presents a confusing model for the flock. Even if celibate, the outcome of such a way of life may fall short of the progressive sanctification that Scripture holds forth as normative for believers, and especially for leaders.   “Remember... Continue Reading

It is tragic to observe the AIC using the tactics of gay Christian writers who have attempted to explain away Romans 1:26,27 since the 1970s. Paul’s assertion that homosexual lust and acts are uniquely “against nature” is manifestly evident in Romans 1:26,27. Those claiming to be evangelicals with a high view of Scripture must not... Continue Reading

It is wrong to weaponize the ethos. It is wrong to shame and blame those with whom we disagree. Criticism is not contention and disagreement is not disunity. To critics of the Plumb Line we would simply say: We love the EPC as much as you do. In all that we have written in the... Continue Reading

The issue the EPC faces is no minor tweak to The Westminster Confession of Faith, its Book of Order or The Essentials of Our Faith.  It’s a major decision and potential radical departure from divine revelation.  As such, it must be recognized for what it is: Spiritual Warfare.  That’s not a popular term, but it’s... Continue Reading

Same sex attraction is sexual impurity; it is sin. SSA persons need repentance, discipleship, and pastoral care. Putting a person with homosexual attraction in leadership would be disobedience to God and a failure to protect the bride of Christ. It is unthinkable to make a wounded sheep the shepherd of the flock. We have some... Continue Reading