The typical male is repelled by the notion that homosexuality is a matter of mere moral indifference, as if sodomy were no different than being left-handed. The question is whether they have the freedom to admit that out loud. Under progressive rule, they do not. Will Democrats learn anything from this? No. Because it would require repudiating their entire philosophy.

One of the most intriguing narratives arising out of the 2024 election is the growing gender gap in how men and women identify politically.

Men, especially young men, are becoming more conservative, and women are becoming more liberal. As The New York Times recently reported, men are also becoming more religious.

Media reports exist aplenty at this point, documenting the statistical divide.

Even political strategists are taking notice. Former President Donald Trump and Sen. J.D. Vance, so the story goes, are deliberately building a coalition around men. They appear on all the “bro” podcasts in hopes of channeling all the collective male energy to catapult them to victory. In contrast, Democrats are relying upon women, particularly pro-abortion women, to win in November. As a result, Vice President Kamala Harris has a massive shortfall when it comes to male support. The Democrats know they have a masculinity problem, which is part of the reason that the folksy Gov. Tim Walz was selected as Harris’ running mate. With all of his Midwestern schmaltziness, he adds to that his love for football (“Coach Walz”) and his love for hunting. He is meant to channel the everyday American dad. The masculinity gap also explains the origins of the “White Dudes for Harris” subgroup, which is as cringy and low testosterone as it sounds.

Why are Democrats now having to go to great lengths to get male voters?

Read More