Many Christian universities and seminaries influenced by theological liberalism have long taught that the book of Genesis should be read symbolically rather than historically. The intent may be to make Christianity more intellectually acceptable, but the result erodes the intended meaning of Scripture. 

Data from the National Survey of Religious Leaders reveals that only 25% of Catholic and mainline Protestant pastors say they firmly believe in a literal Adam and Eve. Among Evangelical pastors, the numbers are somewhat better, but a notable portion still express doubt or uncertainty about whether Adam and Eve were real historical figures.

For some, this may seem like a minor theological point in the broader narrative of Scripture. But in truth, whether Adam and Eve were real people has profound implications for the authority of the Bible, the doctrine of original sin, the credibility of Jesus’ teachings, and the very foundation of the Gospel itself.

Genesis presents Adam and Eve not as metaphorical symbols but as literal individuals created uniquely by God. Genesis 2:7, ESV, says, “Then the Lord God formed the man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature.”

This verse isn’t written in the style of myth or parable. It’s a clear and deliberate account of the origin of humanity. Later, in Genesis 2:22, the creation of Eve is described in similarly specific terms: “And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man.”

These are historical claims. The language of Genesis is unmistakably descriptive and personal. To treat Adam and Eve as fictional archetypes is to fundamentally alter the nature of the biblical narrative.

More troubling is the downstream effect this has on the rest of Christian doctrine. If Adam and Eve weren’t real, then there was no literal fall, no original sin, and therefore no need for a savior. The Apostle Paul grounds the need for redemption in the reality of Adam’s transgression.

In Romans 5:12, Paul writes, “Therefore, just as sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because all sinned.” He isn’t speculating or philosophizing. He’s building a theological argument based on a historical event.

The parallel Paul draws is between two real individuals: Adam, the first man, whose disobedience brought death, and Jesus Christ, the God-man, whose obedience brings life. Romans 5:19 says, “For as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.” If Adam never lived, the structure of Paul’s Gospel message collapses.

This theological connection is not confined to Paul. Jesus affirmed the historicity of Genesis when he said, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female?” (Matthew 19:4). Jesus’ reference to Adam and Eve used their creation to affirm the sanctity of marriage, rooting His teaching in the literal account of humanity’s beginning.

Read More