Your faith doesn’t have to be unreasonable or blind. It can be forensic—evidence-based, thoughtful, and defensible. The question isn’t whether you have enough faith, but whether you have the right kind of faith.

As a detective, I’ve spent decades analyzing evidence, evaluating testimonies, and building cases that can withstand scrutiny in a courtroom. This investigative mindset has taught me something crucial about belief itself—not all beliefs are created equal. In fact, there are three distinct ways we can hold any belief, and understanding these categories transforms how we approach faith, particularly our faith in God.

The Trap of Unreasonable Belief

The first way people hold beliefs is perhaps the most dangerous: unreasonable belief. This occurs when we maintain a position despite evidence pointing to the contrary. Take, for example, the old wives’ tale that warts come from frogs. We now have substantial medical evidence demonstrating that warts are caused by human papillomavirus, not amphibious contact. Yet if someone continues believing the frog theory despite this contrary evidence, they’re holding an unreasonable belief.

This same pattern shows up in matters of faith. Some people cling to religious ideas even when presented with compelling evidence that challenges their position. They’ve made their mind up regardless of what the facts might suggest, and no amount of evidence will budge them from their stance. This isn’t faith—it’s stubborn denial dressed up as devotion.

The Problem with Blind Belief

The second category is blind belief—accepting something as true without any real evidence to support it. This might seem more innocent than unreasonable belief, but it carries its own risks. Let me give you a personal example: I believe my father is my biological father, even though I wasn’t raised by him and have never taken a paternity test to prove it. I simply accept this belief without verification. I could be right, or I could be wrong—I’m essentially believing blindly.

Read More