We cannot always explain why we suffer. To do so, to take control by explaining it away, would be to follow Job’s friends in their retributive principle or to follow Elihu in his claim to speak on behalf of God. Instead, we have to cast ourselves wholly into the God who is beyond our comprehension.

At the end of the book of Job, after thirty-seven chapters of argument, accusation, and anguish, Job says something that has confused readers for millennia: “I despise myself, and repent in dust and ashes” (Job 42:6). Some readers take this as a confession, namely, that Job finally admits that he was wrong, that his suffering was deserved, that his friends were right all along.

But that reading has a serious problem. It puts us on the side of Job’s three friends. And the whole book of Job aims to deny their viewpoint, stemming from the principle of retribution (i.e., you get what you deserve).

So if that is not what Job means, then what does Job repent of? That is what this article seeks to answer. To answer that question, we need to begin with Job’s three friends who accuse Job of suffering because of sin.

Job’s Friends Accuse Him

Job’s three friends (Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar) accuse him of sin. Their argument is simple: suffering is punishment; therefore, Job must have done something to deserve it. Repentance is what he must do. But we as readers know that Job is innocent, because God himself declares it.

In the book’s prologue, God says of Job: “There is none like him on the earth, a blameless and upright man” (Job 1:8; cf. 2:3). And at the very end of the book, God rebukes the friends directly: “You have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has” (Job 42:7–8). In other words, Job is upright and speaks rightly.

A fourth friend, Elihu, enters the dialogue in Job 32–37 and accuses Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar of failing to find an answer, even though they declared Job guilty. He also accuses Job of vindicating himself rather than vindicating God. Elihu thus aims to vindicate God on God’s behalf.

As I will explain below, God does not appear to want or need Elihu to do so, placing Elihu’s words as a failed attempt to take control of Job’s situation by over-reading his theology and thus denying the mystery of God’s Being.

Job’s Desire to Plead His Case

Although Job’s friends accuse him, Job does not cave. Throughout the dialogues, Job insists that if he could only stand before God, he could vindicate himself. He is confident that he could argue his case and be declared innocent:

• “But I would speak to the Almighty, and I desire to argue my case with God” (Job 13:3).
• “Though he slay me, I will hope in him; yet I will argue my ways to his face” (Job 13:15–16).
• “Behold, I have prepared my case; I know that I shall be in the right” (Job 13:18).
• “Oh, that I knew where I might find him, that I might come even to his seat! I would lay my case before him and fill my mouth with arguments” (Job 23:3–5).
• “There an upright man could argue with him, and I would be acquitted forever by my judge” (Job 23:7).
• “Oh, that I had one to hear me! Here is my signature! Let the Almighty answer me!” (Job 31:35).

Job wanted a day in court with the Almighty. He got one. But when God speaks from the whirlwind, he does not invite Job to present his case. He turns the tables: “Who is this that darkens counsel by words without knowledge? Gird up your loins like a man, I will question you, and you shall declare to me” (Job 38:2–3).

God Answers from the Whirlwind

After 35 chapters of silence, God finally speaks to Job (Job 38–41), but God does not answer Job in ways we might expect. He does not explain Job’s suffering, nor does he adjudicate the dispute between Job and his friends.

God simply reveals himself: his power, his wisdom, his transcendence. His speech harkens back to Job 28, the key chapter of the book, which argues that human beings cannot find wisdom because only God knows where it dwells.

Read More