The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Coram Deo Conference - click for details
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Biblical and Theological/We Need a Thicker View of God’s Love

We Need a Thicker View of God’s Love

Union with Christ puts us into union with his people.

Written by Kelly M. Kapic | Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Since Christian life is a response to the love of God, and Jesus is the One who leads that response, from first to last we encounter love and grace in him. As those united to our Messiah, we’re also recipients of his life and activity. We can be so familiar with the central doctrines of Christianity that we stop seeing them, so don’t miss this: Jesus doesn’t just love us—he loves God for us. Christ is both God’s ultimate expression of love for humanity and humanity’s ultimate expression of love for God.

 

Both in theology and in practice, we’ll get ourselves into trouble by picking between two equally true ideas. We make enemies of what should be friends.

For example, should we highlight divine transcendence or immanence? Is it better if our theology is Trinitarian or Christ-centered? Ought we to focus on the “objective” or the “subjective” sides of Christian life? Do we need to think of the church as universal or as local? The list could go on and on.

But why pick?

The mark of a good theologian (whether armchair or academic) isn’t simply affirming the “right things” but the ability to uphold multiple aspects of scriptural truth and not just pick the one that seems most useful at the time.

Take the classic matter of how divine and human agency relate: Some people so highlight God’s sovereignty that human response appears irrelevant, while others so focus on individual agency that they appear to devalue or ignore God’s presence, primacy, and power.

While I was researching and writing a theology of Christian life, I found myself right in the middle of these tensions, wrestling with how to uphold multiple biblical truths rather than pick between them.

We can summarize Christian life as a response to the love of God. To unpack that in a simple but nonsimplistic way, we need to recognize multiple layers to that human response.

Theology of Life

After some years thinking through this basic idea of what this response to the love of God looks like—yes, I’m that slow—I finally framed a theology of Christian life in three sentences:

Thesis: Christian life is a response to the love of God.

Underlying Theology: The triune God not only first loved us, but the incarnate Son also first loved God for us. We (corporately and personally) respond to God’s love as those who have been united to Christ by the Spirit.

Those brief statements describe a Christ-centered, ecclesially grounded, and personal response to God’s love. Let’s unpack this more.

I think of the human response to the love of God as three strands of a rope: Messiah, ecclesia (church), and ego (me). These three cords together allow our understanding and experience of Christian life to be Christ-centered and subjectively engaged, while also ecclesially anchored. Trying to pick only one from among them is a false and destructive choice.

Threefold Cord

Ecclesiastes 4:12 tells us that “a threefold cord is not quickly broken.”

Read More

Related Posts:

  • Is Jesus Christ the Natural and Adopted Son of God?
  • Magistracy: An Institution of Christ upon the Throne
  • Thoughts on Overture 12 From the 2023 PCA General…
  • An Excerpt From Stephen Wellum’s Systematic…
  • Theological Language and the Fatherhood of God: An…

Subscribe to Free “Top 10 Stories” Email

Get the top 10 stories from The Aquila Report in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Name(Required)

Archives

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Reformation Worship Conference - click for details
Coram Deo Conference - click for details

Books

Tool Small by Craig Biehl - Why Atheists Can't Know What They Say They Know
Disciplines of a Godly Man - by R. Kent Hughes
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Books

The Letter of Jude - book from Tulip Publishing
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2026 The Aquila Report · Log in