The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Coram Deo Conference - click for details
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Featured/Theistic Evolution and Creationism

Theistic Evolution and Creationism

Do some prayerful reading and research. You might be surprised to find out how weak the case for Darwinism really is.

Written by Keith Mathison | Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Darwin’s theory has always had some serious weaknesses. For example, from the beginning, every version of the theory assumed the existence of the biological process of reproduction as a given. Descent with modification assumes a process by which descent takes place. But how did the process of reproduction (a mind-bogglingly complex biological process) itself evolve without an already existing process of reproduction?

 

Since 1859, when Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was published, Christians have been forced to wrestle with the challenges raised by his theory of naturalistic evolution. For millennia, Christians had taught that God created each species according to its kind. Slight changes may accrue for various reasons, but cows remain cows and horses remain horses. Darwin challenged this teaching by proposing a theory to surmise how various organisms may have arisen over time from a common ancestor. He suggested that offspring differ slightly from their parents and from each other. Animal breeders have long observed the same thing and take advantage of these variations by selecting the most desirable offspring to produce the next generation.

Darwin argued that something analogous to a human breeder exists in nature without any intelligent choices being made by anyone—human or divine. He argued that some biological variations provide individual offspring with advantages that make their survival more likely. Over time, those offspring with such advantageous traits survive, breed, and pass down those traits to the next generation. Thus, the mechanism of evolution was said to be a purely “natural selection.” When Gregor Mendel’s work on genetics was rediscovered at the turn of the twentieth century, an explanation for variations in offspring was added to Darwin’s theory.

Christian Responses to Evolution

Christians have responded to Darwin’s theory in a number of ways since it was first published. Some have rejected the theory completely, explaining its scientific problems but emphasizing that Darwinism is contrary to Scripture. We see this approach in the work of organizations such as Answers in Genesis, Creation Ministries International, and the Institute for Creation Research. Others have rejected the theory completely but have focused almost exclusively on the argument that it is contrary to the evidence in nature. We see this approach in the Intelligent Design movement represented most famously by the Discovery Institute. The essential point to note here is that the Christians involved in these various organizations tend to agree that descent with modification and natural selection can account for neither the origin of life nor the diversity of life.

Read More

Related Posts:

  • 4 Biblical Reasons I Rejected Evolution
  • Which Theory of Evolution? Toppling the Idol of…
  • Evolution Is a Question of Philosophy, Not Biology
  • Common Descent or Common Design?
  • Does Biology Need “Queer Theory”?

Subscribe to Free “Top 10 Stories” Email

Get the top 10 stories from The Aquila Report in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Name(Required)

Archives

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Belhaven University
Coram Deo Conference - click for details

Books

Tool Small by Craig Biehl - Why Atheists Can't Know What They Say They Know
Plumbing the Depths of Darkness - click for details
Reformed Covenant Theology - by Dr. Harrison Perkins
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Books

The Letter of Jude - book from Tulip Publishing
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2026 The Aquila Report · Log in