The primary concern of the conservative leaders throughout the years, Lucas maintains, was what they saw as a progressive assault on both the traditional view of Scripture and the integrity of the Westminster Standards. Yet he’s quick to point out that tied to these core concerns were a host of other issues—the progressives’ emphasis on social and political issues such as temperance, desegregation, integration, Communism, and feminism…. Yet perhaps the most gripping is his treatment of conservative views toward race relations and the civil rights movement. The great care Lucas takes throughout, but especially in these sections, results in a history that both benefits the scholar and edifies the believer.

Sean Michael Lucas. For A Continuing Church: The Roots of the Presbyterian Church in America. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2015. 368 pp. $19.99.

In his seminal book, The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind (1994), Mark Noll dolefully observed: “The scandal of the evangelical mind is that there is not much of an evangelical mind.” More than simply lamenting the situation, though, Noll challenged evangelicals to embrace the life of the mind. Many since have answered that call to action, resulting in a wealth of excellent scholarship across a broad range of disciplines. Not since the mid-to-late 19th century have American evangelicals made such an impact on academic research. And fortunately, through the efforts of individuals such as Sean Michael Lucas, that will continue.

In his most recent book, For A Continuing Church: The Roots of the Presbyterian Church in America, Lucas offers the first scholarly treatment of the Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) while deftly avoiding the pitfalls associated with addressing a subject close to one’s heart.

While one can sense Lucas’s support for the denomination throughout—he is a senior minister in the PCA and associate professor of church history at Reformed Theological Seminary in Jackson, Mississippi—he doesn’t shy away from or dismiss troublesome thoughts and practices of his subjects. To borrow a well-worn phrase, it’s all here: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Someone needed to tell this story faithfully, and Lucas’s ability to do so results in an excellent historical study. It makes for a challenging and edifying experience for Christians across the denominational spectrum.

History that Benefits and Edifies

Calling on a myriad of primary sources—such as records and minutes of the various Presbyterian ruling bodies, the denomination’s journals, and the correspondence of leading conservatives and progressives—Lucas puts forward a convincing argument regarding the development of the PCA. Despite the multitude of issues that sparked conflict within the Presbyterian Church in the United States (PCUS), the central concern for conservative Presbyterians was their progressive brethren’s “rejection of the authority of the Bible and abandonment of the Reformed faith summarized in the Westminster Standards” (219).

According to Lucas, the signs of trouble were present by the end of the 19th century when PCUS leaders such as James I. Vance and Walter Lingle began introducing Presbyterians—by way of seminaries, training schools, publications, and pulpits—to the ideas of the social gospel and Protestant liberalism. While some conservative leaders took notice at this early stage, most did not. By 1940, however, the strength of the progressives had grown to the point where seemingly clear cases of doctrinal deviations by leaders such as Ernest Trice Thompson and Hay Watson Smith were either ignored or outright defended by the ruling bodies of the PCUS.

Alarmed but sluggish, over the next three decades conservatives slowly organized and rallied behind the Presbyterian Journal, Concerned Presbyterians, Presbyterian Evangelistic Fellowship, the Executive Committee for Overseas Evangelism, and Reformed Theological Seminary. Leaders such as Aiken Taylor, Bill Hill, and Kennedy Smartt held increasingly dim views of the future of the PCUS, and by 1971 many of these leaders had come to the conclusion their efforts were too little and too late to reclaim their church. Not all agreed. Stalwarts like Nelson Bell and Robert Strong held true to their commitment to the PCUS while other conservatives charted a path for a “continuing church.” This path eventually led to the creation of the Presbyterian Church in America (originally named National Presbyterian Church) on December 4, 1973.

Read More