The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Coram Deo Conference - click for details
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Biblical and Theological/The Two Ditches: Why Both Christian Extremes Are Wrong About Israel

The Two Ditches: Why Both Christian Extremes Are Wrong About Israel

Both quote the Bible. Neither tells the whole story.  

Written by Mikale Olson | Thursday, April 9, 2026

Tell the whole story, and both ditches lose their appeal. The covenant was never about tribal pride. It was about Christ. And Christ is still gathering a people, from Israel and from the nations, into one redeemed family.

 

Right now, if you scroll long enough through conservative Christian feeds, you will see two very different tempers about Israel—two extremes; two ditches.

One says this: God told Abraham, “I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse.” That settles it. End of discussion. If you are a Christian, you (your country) must support the modern state of Israel in all things and give them as many resources as they want. To hesitate is to risk standing under God’s curse.

The other says this: Christ fulfilled the promises. The covenant is over. Ethnic Israel no longer carries any theological weight (they may even be a “curse” that must be “handled”). And from there, in some corners, the tone darkens into sheer, often conspiratorial resentment against Jewish people at-large (even going so far as to sanitize the likes of Hitler), convinced they are simply applying biblical covenant theology.

Both sides quote the Bible. A lot. Both sides tell a partial story. Neither tells the whole one.

So let’s tell the whole story.

It begins with one man in Ur. In the Book of Genesis 12, God calls Abram out of paganism and makes him a promise. “I will make of you a great nation…I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” That is not random favoritism. That is the launch of redemption after the wreckage of Genesis 3 and the scattering at Babel.

From that moment on, the storyline tightens. Abraham has two sons, but God says, “Through Isaac shall your offspring be named.” Isaac has two sons, and before they are born, God declares, “The older will serve the younger.” The line narrows to Jacob. Then to Judah. Then to David. The promise is like a thread running through generations, sometimes barely visible, often hanging by a strand.

Pharaoh takes Sarah. “The Lord afflicted Pharaoh and his house with great plagues.” Abimelech takes her. God warns him in a dream, “You are a dead man.” Why such severity? Because if that line collapses, the promise collapses. And if the promise collapses, the world stays under the curse (the curse of sin; Genesis 3).

Centuries later, Israel is enslaved in Egypt. God tells Moses, “I have remembered my covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob.” The plagues fall again. The sea parts. A nation is born. The covenant promise is still moving forward, just as God intended.

But Israel is never portrayed as morally flawless. They grumble in the wilderness. They worship golden calves. They demand a king. They split into two kingdoms. They fall into idolatry (a lot). Prophets warn them. They kill their own prophets. God judges them in their rebellion (a lot). Assyria comes. Babylon comes. Exile comes. If you read the Old Testament honestly, you see two things at once. Israel is chosen. Israel is stubborn. And yet the promise keeps advancing.

Then a Jewish child is born in Bethlehem. Matthew opens his Gospel with a genealogy that runs straight back to Abraham and David, keeping our eyes on the big picture. Paul later explains what that means in Galatians 3:16: “Now the promises were made to Abraham and to his offspring…who is Christ.” The thread finally reaches its destination. The offspring is not merely a nation. It is a person.

Read More

Related Posts:

  • What Is Antisemitism—and What It Isn’t
  • Blessing and Cursing
  • “Go from Your Country”: The Call and the Covenant…
  • What Is the Abrahamic Covenant?
  • A Christian Case for America First

Subscribe to Free “Top 10 Stories” Email

Get the top 10 stories from The Aquila Report in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Name(Required)

Archives

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Belhaven University
Coram Deo Conference - click for details

Books

Tool Small by Craig Biehl - Why Atheists Can't Know What They Say They Know
Plumbing the Depths of Darkness - click for details
That Hideous Strength: A Deeper Look at How the West was Lost (Expanded Edition)
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Books

The Letter of Jude - book from Tulip Publishing
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2026 The Aquila Report · Log in