The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Providence College
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Biblical and Theological/The Subversion of Biblical Authority

The Subversion of Biblical Authority

Some of the very evangelicals who claim support of the Chicago Statement on Inerrancy seem to be waffling on the sister statement on hermeneutics.

Written by Bruce A. Little | Monday, July 5, 2021

It is true that Christians are imperfect and absolute epistemological certainty may elude Christians at times, but in the end standpoint epistemology denies the possibility of meaningful dialogue, but more importantly it removes the possibility of objective knowledge of God subverting biblical authority

 

In the latter half of the 20th century (1978), a number of evangelical scholars met in Chicago to consider the question of the inerrancy of Scripture which at that time was being questioned. In play was whether the doctrine of Inspiration guaranteed that the entirety of the Old and New Testaments in the original manuscripts were without error in all they affirmed. The culmination of the deliberations of those at the meeting is known as the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy which affirmed the inerrancy of the biblical text and hence the authority of the Bible in all matters it addressed.  Subsequently, a number of evangelical institutions adopted the Chicago Statement on Inerrancy as part of their public doctrinal commitments. However, soon after the 1978 Summit, evangelicals wisely realized that the matter of hermeneutics must also be addressed. Afterall, unless a person believed one could have access to the objective truth of Scripture affirming inerrancy would have little practical impact for the community of Faith.  Consequently, in 1982, evangelical scholars met again in Chicago to consider the matter of hermeneutics. The question was whether the objective truth of Scripture could be known by the human interpreter. After several days of serious deliberation, the convening members produced a document known as The Chicago Council on Biblical Hermeneutics. In part, it states in Article IX: “We affirm that the term hermeneutics, which historically signified the rules of exegesis, may properly be extended to cover all that is involved in the process of perceiving what the biblical revelation means and how it bears on our lives. We deny that the message of Scripture derives from, or is dictated by, the interpreter’s understanding. Thus, we deny that the ‘horizons’ of the biblical writer and the interpreter may rightly ‘fuse’ in such a way that what the text communicates to the interpreter is not ultimately controlled by the expressed meaning of the Scripture.” This logically and theologically connected the two documents affirming that through proper hermeneutics and the ministry of the Holy Spirit true knowledge of God could be known to the human interpreter. This affirmed that the human interpreter could intellectually approach the written text of Scripture and receive objective truth as intended by God that he might know God truthfully, although not completely.

Read More

Related Posts:

  • How We Got Here
  • The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy: Due for an…
  • What is Inerrancy?
  • Updating the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy: A…
  • What Difference Does an Inerrant Bible Make?

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Providence College
Belhaven University

Archives

Books

Geerhardus Vos: Reformed Biblical Theologian, Confessional Presbyterian - by Danny Olinger

Special

God is Holy
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donations
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Important:

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Special

Letter of Jude
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts
Providence Christian College - visit

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2023 The Aquila Report · Log in