What’s better? Not just believing in Christ, but suffering for Him. Far from seeing his imprisonment as an obstacle to God’s mission, Paul trusted that God’s plan for his life was working to further God’s kingdom and build up His church. Because salvation for our sins came through the redemptive suffering of Jesus, Paul knew that God’s mission would go forward through the redemptive suffering of God’s people.

This week (January 8) marks the sixty-fifth anniversary of the death of Jim Elliot, Nate Saint, Ed McCully, Pete Fleming, and Roger Youderian. The five missionaries were speared to death in the jungles of Ecuador in 1956. They were all in their late 20s and early 30s.

In subsequent years, Elisabeth Elliot, Jim’s widow, and Rachel Saint, Nate’s sister, went back to the Huaroani tribe to continue the work of their family members. Many among the tribe eventually put their trust in Christ.

Before he died, Nate Saint wrote:

That quote presents a challenge not only to missionaries but to all Christians. We should see ourselves as expendable for the sake of the gospel because there is something greater than this earthly life.

You’ve probably heard the famous line from Jim Eliot’s journal:

It’s powerful for the way it restates a principle we learn from Jesus (“Deny yourself, take up your cross, and follow Me. The one who loses his life for My sake will find it”) and also lines up with the example of the Apostle Paul (“To live is Christ and to die is gain”).

Paul saw the life of the believer as ultimately consisting of two options: good and better. This is the secret to his contentment. This is the secret to his passion. It gives him courage in the face of opposition. And the secret of “good vs. better” challenges the American mindset today as we remember the 65^th anniversary of the death of these five men. Take a look at two ways the “good versus better” secret takes shape.

GOOD: Living for Christ by serving others.
BETTER: Dying and being with Christ.

In his letter to the Philippians, Paul says it’s good to live for Christ by serving others, but it’s better to die and be with Christ.

Paul is imprisoned under house arrest. He’s chained to a guard. Most people would say, “Paul is in a bad situation, and things could get worse quickly if the authorities execute him.”

Bad: imprisonment.
Worse: martyrdom.

But Paul doesn’t think in terms of “bad to worse.” He knows the secret of “good vs. better.” Instead, he says, “For me to live is Christ and to die is gain!” In other words, As long as I’ve got breath, I can serve my Savior. I can labor in love for other people. I can continue my ministry of teaching and writing. I can keep working to form other people into the image of Jesus Christ, my Savior. To live is Christ. And get this: to die is gain! To die means being with Jesus. My martyrdom would be a better thing for me personally. So, I’m torn––not between bad and worse, but between good and better.

Paul’s upside-down (or right-side up) mindset reminds me of the old emblem of the American Baptist foreign missionary society. There’s an ox standing next to a plough, in front of an altar. The motto at the top says: “Ready for Either.” In other words: “Christian, you’re like the ox—ready to exert yourself in labor, or ready to be a sacrifice.”

Where does this mindset come from? It takes root in the heart of the Christian who knows that the past, present, and future is up to God. Ambrose, the fourth century pastor, summed up Paul’s mindset this way:

In the end we belong to God. He made us. He can do with us what He pleases. We’ll be with Him soon. The future is in His hands.

Paul sees life in terms of “good vs. better” because his source of joy is not something he’s created, but something he’s received. His hope is grounded not in a dream that he has invented, but by a reality he has witnessed. He finds joy because of the presence of the Person on the other side of the grave.

Read More