The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Coram Deo Conference - click for details
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Biblical and Theological/The Earliest Non-Christian Testimony to Jesus (Josephus) Turns Out to Be Genuine

The Earliest Non-Christian Testimony to Jesus (Josephus) Turns Out to Be Genuine

This testimony is a highly valuable non-Christian verification of what Christians have always believed.

Written by Kenneth Berding | Tuesday, June 10, 2025

The testimony of our earliest known non-Christian witness to Jesus closely correlates with what the writers of the Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) believed and wrote about Jesus: that Jesus performed miracles, was accepted as the Christ by his followers, was condemned to death by Pilate at the instigation of Jewish leaders, crucified on a cross, and viewed as risen from the dead by his devotees—all in fulfillment of prophetic Scripture.

 

Most of you have probably heard of Josephus. An enormous amount of what we know about the history and culture of the Jewish people in and around the time of Jesus comes from Josephus. But Josephus only wrote one paragraph about Jesus. That paragraph is famous. It is so famous that the paragraph has its own name (in Latin): Testimonium Flavianum (TF).[1] As famous as it is, it is also famously disputed. Until the publication of T. C. Schmidt’s new academic monograph, Josephus and Jesus: New Evidence for the One Called Christ, the consensus among most modern historians has been that this famous paragraph was partially (or fully) interpolated by Christians scribes who placed nice words about Jesus on the lips of Josephus (impacting the later manuscript tradition).

Let me paste in this paragraph as it’s normally translated/interpreted so you can see why modern historians have typically viewed this as too positively “Christian” for a non-Christian Jew like Josephus to have written. This section is from Josephus’s Antiquities of the Jews 18.63-4, “according to how it has most often been interpreted by modern scholars”[2]:

And in this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man, for he was a doer of miraculous deeds, a teacher of men who receive truth with pleasure. And he led many from among the Jews and many from among the Greeks. He was the Christ. And, when Pilate had condemned him to the cross at the accusation of the first men among us, those who at first loved him did not cease to do so, for he appeared to them alive again on the third day given that the divine prophets had spoken such things and thousands of other wonderful things about him. And up till now the tribe of the Christians, who were named from him, has not disappeared.

Most historians have viewed this paragraph as too “Christian” to have been written by Josephus. But Schmidt has methodically (and convincingly, in my opinion) dismantled the consensus that views significant parts of this paragraph as having been forged by Christian scribes. The paragraph is not positive (as modern scholars have assumed) but should be viewed as “a relatively ambiguous TF that can be plausibly interpreted negatively or neutrally.”[3]

Read More

Related Posts:

  • John the Witness
  • The Worst Witnesses
  • What Are the Different Emphases of the Gospels?
  • What Happened to the Family of Jesus?
  • Nature Miracles, Exorcisms, Healings, Resurrections

Subscribe to Free “Top 10 Stories” Email

Get the top 10 stories from The Aquila Report in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Name(Required)

Archives

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Belhaven University
Coram Deo Conference - click for details

Books

Tool Small by Craig Biehl - Why Atheists Can't Know What They Say They Know
Drawing Water with Joy: 100 Devotions from the Wells of Salvation - click for details
Managing Your Household Well - by Chap Bettis
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Books

The Letter of Jude - book from Tulip Publishing
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2026 The Aquila Report · Log in