The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Coram Deo Conference - click for details
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Biblical and Theological/Should the Church Promote Deeds of Darkness for Missional Purposes?

Should the Church Promote Deeds of Darkness for Missional Purposes?

What if the justification is that “we are trying to reach the culture and love people in the culture and win a hearing with them?”

Written by George Sayour | Tuesday, September 20, 2022

While the line may not be obvious to some for how Christians can serve and witness in the world, it should be clear that hosting an event on church property  in “The Chapel” with a “Dragon” and “Celestial Bodies” with the face of Christ in the backdrop, and where Romans 1 anti-Worship is celebrated should be off limits to PCA Churches, Pastors, and Members.

 

Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.—
Ephesians 5:11

When has idol worship in Israel ever been permitted?  How about encouraged?  How about for “Missional” Purposes?

If an explicitly blasphemous event is held on property owned, managed, serviced by a church should Christians be concerned?  What if the justification is that “we are trying to reach the culture and love people in the culture and win a hearing with them?”

How about if the Event on PCA Church Property is:

  • called “Celestial Bodies,” (and here)
  • held in a ministry and building called “The Chapel,”
  • the headline act is a man named “Eldraco” (the Dragon)
  • who is advertised in front of a stained glass Image of Christ (not in the venue)
  • The other acts are all celebrating aberrant Gender & Sexual Identities
  • Event Culminates in a simulated worship experience called “a Euphoric Dance Party”
  • served by elders/members of the Church including providing free alcohol for the event

No, you’re not reading the Book of Revelation, nor Exodus 32, nor Mark 14’s “abomination that brings desolation.” Or are we?

For most Christians for most of history the answer to this question has not been complicated.  We cannot control what happens in the culture but we certainly can protect what happens on our property. Yet for some in the PCA with a heart to reach the lost this is not the case. And the PCA is undecided as a denomination as to what is ok with regard to property usage and church involvement and what isn’t.

2 years ago “The Chapel,” a ministry run on the Church Property of Memorial Presbyterian Church in St. Louis (And featured in the PCA’s magazine), hosted the Transluminate event which was advertised as “A celebration of transgender, agender, non-binary, genderqueer, and genderfluid artists.”  Due to complaints about this event throughout the denomination, the Missouri Presbytery investigated Memorial PCA and issued this statement.  It is unclear, however,  if this statement says events like Transluminate (or Celestial Bodies for that matter) are off limits for Church Property. The statement would suggest or imply that the issue is not that Christians facilitate these events but rather the issue is that the Church was publicly associated with the event. It seems Memorial PCA has since distanced itself from public promotion of “The Chapel” ministry which is made up of elders and members from Memorial, even as it still occurs on their property and facilities and is on their website.

Is that all that is required?  From conversations around the PCA it seems the pastors in the denomination don’t have a unified position.  It seems most would agree such events shouldn’t be endorsed by a PCA Church but that doesn’t preclude Churches from doing ministry and outreach at such events.  However, isn’t it different when its on Church Property and only exists because the Church attracted such an event?

Read More

[Editor’s note: One or more original URLs (links) referenced in this article are no longer valid; those links have been removed.]

Related Posts:

  • People Loved the Darkness Rather Than the Light
  • Doing More vs. Doing Better
  • Time To Expose Evil
  • Jesus: The Light of the World
  • The Dragon Slayer

Subscribe to Free “Top 10 Stories” Email

Get the top 10 stories from The Aquila Report in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Name(Required)

Archives

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Belhaven University
Coram Deo Conference - click for details

Books

Tool Small by Craig Biehl - Why Atheists Can't Know What They Say They Know
Plumbing the Depths of Darkness - click for details
Reformed Covenant Theology - by Dr. Harrison Perkins
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Books

The Letter of Jude - book from Tulip Publishing
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2026 The Aquila Report · Log in