The supper is Christ’s gift to sinners who need grace, not a painful punishment for those who haven’t had a perfect week. The primary qualification for the table is union with Christ and a willingness to walk in unity with his people.

The congregation moved forward to receive the bread and wine, but I stayed in my seat. While other church members received the elements, I felt paralyzed, replaying my sins from the previous week.

Moments earlier, the pastor had told the congregation that if we had any unresolved sin, we should abstain from the Lord’s Supper. Taking my pastor’s warning seriously, I sat and examined my heart, trying to decide if I should take and eat, or if I was so unworthy that doing so would bring God’s judgment (1 Cor. 11:29). In that moment, the table felt less like a feast of grace and more like a test I wasn’t sure I could pass.

In Reformed churches, fencing the table is a common practice. Communion is for believers, so we rightly warn those who haven’t confessed the faith against taking the bread and cup. In some churches, the fencing goes further, and the table is turned into a place of anxious introspection for believers. When communion is announced, heads drop in solemnity, and a quiet internal interrogation begins: Have I sinned in any way this week? Am I worthy of the table? Should I partake? Many Christians examine themselves in this way because they’ve been taught to do so by well-meaning pastors with sincere concerns over congregants eating “in an unworthy manner” (v. 27).

But is calling Christians to a private self-audit before the supper, or encouraging them to abstain if their consciences are unsettled, a valid application of Paul’s teaching in 1 Corinthians 11:17–34? Is this kind of self-examination what Paul had in mind?

Paul Calls Us to Church-Wide Unity

It’s not. When Paul rebuked the church for not “discerning the body” (v. 29), he wasn’t calling for a solitary inventory of personal sins but for the Corinthian church as a whole to examine its life together.

The preceding verses make this plain. When celebrating the supper, some believers ate privately (v. 21), others went hungry (v. 21), and the wealthy humiliated the poor (v. 22). The supper had become a public display of a divided church that undermined the unity it was meant to proclaim.

In 1 Corinthians 10:16–17, Paul writes that because there is “one bread,” we who are many “are one body.” Communion proclaims that through Christ’s broken body and shed blood, God has united a diverse people into a single redeemed community. When the church comes to the table, we aren’t just remembering Christ individually; we participate together in a shared identity as his reconciled body. The act itself testifies that the gospel creates a family, not a collection of isolated spiritual consumers.

So when Paul says, “Let a person examine himself” (11:28), the examination he has is mind isn’t, as Mark Taylor observes, “mere self-introspection as this verse is often understood.” Taylor continues, “Paul’s perspective is communal. To examine oneself is to examine one’s . . . ways of relating to other members of the community.”

Read More