The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

Coram Deo Conference - click for details
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Featured/Is it the business of the Supreme Court to decide on Same-Sex marriage?

Is it the business of the Supreme Court to decide on Same-Sex marriage?

A professor of Political Science considers the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court on the issue of same-sex marriage

Written by Troy Gibson | Thursday, March 28, 2013

I suppose the strongest argument that it is the Court’s business would be the “full-faith-and-credit” clause of the Constitution, requiring states to honor contracts made in other states. But that’s hardly what backers of same-sex marriage are concerned about. Rather, they want the Supreme Court to declare same-sex marriage a right every individual has regardless of state prerogatives (or the 10th amendment) and they want state laws defining marriage in conjugal ways to be deemed unconstitutional. Issues of jurisdiction and federalism largely.

But if their argument stems from the implied “right to privacy” announced/discovered by the Supreme Court decades ago, as so many others have regarding law and human sexuality, then I’m afraid their case will (should) be problematic for them. After all, sexual choices often have been fairly characterized as private, but marriage never has, either by society or the Supreme Court. It has always and ever been recognized in society and the Supreme Court as an especially public institution (and usually under the province of state law), with major public stakes, and is most emphatically the public’s business. We are not talking about what someone does in the privacy of their bedroom, but what society must legally recognize, promote, define, in its marriage and family laws.

Another take on the proper jurisdiction of the Supreme Court came this past weekend from Constitutional law scholar Michael McConnell. Tuesday and Wednesday of this week, the Supreme Court will hear two cases related to same-sex marriage simultaneously. (one challenging Prop 8 in California, defining marriage conjugally and one challenging the Defense of Marriage Act signed by Bill Clinton in the 1990s, protecting states from being forced to recognize same-sex marriages contracted in other states and defining marriage, as far as federal law goes, as conjugal).

Here’s McConnell’s editorial. A slightly different take on what the Court should do is penned by Ed Whelan here and here. [Editor’s note: the original URL (link) referenced is no longer valid, so the link has been removed.]

Troy Gibson is a Political Science Professor at the University of Southern Mississippi, specializing in Religion and Politics in America. He attends Woodland Presbyterian Church (PCA) with his wife, Natalie, and three children, Caleb, Noah, and Sarah Ann. This article first appeared on his blog, The Reformed Mind, and is used with permission.

Related Posts:

  • This State Tried to Force a Christian Photographer…
  • 303 Creative Is a Big Win for Religious Liberty at…
  • Supreme Court Hands Religious Freedom Win To Postal…
  • SCOTUS Delivers Major Win for a Christian Preacher…
  • A Clear Ruling on Religious Accommodation

Subscribe to Free “Top 10 Stories” Email

Get the top 10 stories from The Aquila Report in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Name(Required)

Archives

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Belhaven University
Coram Deo Conference - click for details

Books

Tool Small by Craig Biehl - Why Atheists Can't Know What They Say They Know
Drawing Water with Joy: 100 Devotions from the Wells of Salvation - click for details
Fake ID - by Abdu Murray - How AI and Identity Ideology Are Collapsing Reality - click for details
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Books

The Letter of Jude - book from Tulip Publishing
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2026 The Aquila Report · Log in