The Aquila Report

Your independent source for news and commentary from and about conservative, orthodox evangelicals in the Reformed and Presbyterian family of churches

  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Biblical
    and Theological
  • Churches
    and Ministries
  • People
    in the News
  • World
    and Life News
  • Lifestyle
    and Reviews
    • Books
    • Movies
    • Music
  • Opinion
    and Commentary
  • General Assembly
    and Synod Reports
    • ARP General Synod
    • EPC General Assembly
    • OPC General Assembly
    • PCA General Assembly
    • PCUSA General Assembly
    • RPCNA Synod
    • URCNA Synod
  • Subscribe
    to Weekly Email
  • Search
Home/Lifestyle/Books/An Unhelpful Description of Sanctification

An Unhelpful Description of Sanctification

Sanctification is not “getting back to the reality of our justification.”

Written by Shane Lems | Monday, December 9, 2013

I don’t want to throw Tchividjian under the bus here.  I haven’t read anything else he’s written and I don’t follow his ministry at all.  Maybe he’s clarified this elsewhere.  I just wanted to point this out, echoing what Mark Jones said in Antinomianism (p. 111-121), that we should be careful when speaking about biblical truths and doctrines.  Rhetoric and hyperbole might sound good and grab attention, but we need to work hard to be precise and accurate in our language.  I believe the Reformed confessions and catechisms do a nice job of biblically describing justification, faith, and sanctification, even if the statements in them are not popular, trendy, or twitterable.  

 

In his popular book, Jesus + Nothing = Everything, Tullian Tchividjian gives many great explanations of what God’s grace means for sinners like us.  This book constantly focuses the reader on Jesus’ saving work.  There are quite a few helpful and encouraging words in this book.  But it’s not on my recommended reading list.  Why?  Because I don’t think Tchividjian’s description of sanctification is clearly confessional and biblical.  Don’t overreact here; I’m not saying the book is heretical, horrible, or an attack on the gospel.  I’m simply saying the description of sanctification is unhelpful.  For example, here are some quotes from pages 95-96:

“Sanctification is the daily hard work of getting back to the reality of our justification.  It’s going back to the certainty of our objectively secured pardon in Christ and hitting the refresh button a thousand times a day.”

“The hard work of Christian growth, therefore, is to think less of ourselves and our performance and more of Jesus and his performance for us.”

“Think of what Paul tells us in Philippians 2:12: ‘Work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.’  We’ve got work to do…What precisely is Paul exhorting us to do?  He goes on to explain: ‘For it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure’ (v. 13).  God works his work in you, which is the work already accomplished by Christ.  Our hard work, therefore, means coming to a greater understanding of his work.”

The Reformed confessions and catechisms talk about sanctification quite a bit.  But they don’t talk about sanctification as “getting back to the reality of our justification,” or, “coming to a greater understanding of [Christ’s] work.”  These statements probably fit better in the discussion of true faith (i.e. WLC Q/A 72, HC Q/A 60-61), but they are not Reformed ways to speak about sanctification.

How do the confessions and catechisms talk about sanctification?  Well, first of all sanctification is about the Christian obeying God’s law out of gratitude for salvation and new life in Christ (HC Q/A 32-115).  Second, sanctification has to do with dying to sin and living according to righteousness (WLC Q/A 75, HC Q/A 88-90).  Also, the confessions mention in the discussions of sanctification our good works as “fruits and evidences of a true and lively faith” (WCF 16.2).  We can gain assurance of our faith from the fruits of our faith.  The confessions and catechisms say more about sanctification; this is just a summary (for biblical references, see the proof texts of the confessions given).  But certainly sanctification is not “getting back to the reality of our justification.”

I don’t want to throw Tchividjian under the bus here.  I haven’t read anything else he’s written and I don’t follow his ministry at all.  Maybe he’s clarified this elsewhere.  I just wanted to point this out, echoing what Mark Jones said in Antinomianism (p. 111-121), that we should be careful when speaking about biblical truths and doctrines.  Rhetoric and hyperbole might sound good and grab attention, but we need to work hard to be precise and accurate in our language.  I believe the Reformed confessions and catechisms do a nice job of biblically describing justification, faith, and sanctification, even if the statements in them are not popular, trendy, or twitterable.  If we want to be biblical and confessional, I’d say let’s do our best to use biblical and confessional language.

“What is sanctification?  Sanctification is the work of God’s free grace (Ezek. 36:27, Phil. 2:13, 2 Thes. 2:13), whereby we are renewed in the whole man after the image of God (2 Cor. 5:17, Eph. 4:23-24, 1 Thess. 5:23), and are enabled more and more to die unto sin, and live unto righteousness (Ezek. 36:25-27, Rom. 6:4, 6, 12-14, 2 Cor. 7:1, 1 Pet. 2:24) (WSC Q/A 35).”

Shane Lems is the pastor of Covenant Presbyterian Church (OPC) in Hammond, WI. He is a graduate of Westminster Seminary California. He blogs, along with fellow classmate Andrew Compton, at Reformed Reader where this article first appeared: it is used with permission.

Related Posts:

  • 7 Assertions Regarding Justification & Sanctification
  • The Least Holy Person in Your Church
  • The Forgotten Side of Sanctification
  • The Doctrine of Adoption
  • Did the Reformers Believe in a Justification by Works?

Subscribe to Free “Top 10 Stories” Email

Get the top 10 stories from The Aquila Report in your inbox every Tuesday morning.

Name(Required)

Archives

Subscribe, Follow, Listen

  • email-alt
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • apple-podcasts
  • anchor
Belhaven University

Books

Tool Small by Craig Biehl - Why Atheists Can't Know What They Say They Know
Plumbing the Depths of Darkness - click for details
How To Lead Your Family - by Joel Beeke
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Donate
  • Email Alerts
  • Leadership
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Principles and Practices
  • Privacy Policy

Free Subscription

Aquila Report Email Alerts

Books

The Letter of Jude - book from Tulip Publishing
  • About
  • Advertise Here
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Principles and Practices
  • RSS Feed
  • Subscribe to Weekly Email Alerts

DISCLAIMER: The Aquila Report is a news and information resource. We welcome commentary from readers; for more information visit our Letters to the Editor link. All our content, including commentary and opinion, is intended to be information for our readers and does not necessarily indicate an endorsement by The Aquila Report or its governing board. In order to provide this website free of charge to our readers,  Aquila Report uses a combination of donations, advertisements and affiliate marketing links to  pay its operating costs.

Return to top of page

Website design by Five More Talents · Copyright © 2026 The Aquila Report · Log in