We Christians must stop mistaking cultural memory for Christian faith. Nostalgia is not belief. Border enforcement, while a great beginning, alone is not enough. Some may place their hopes for renewal in political or cultural shifts. Others place their hope in a model of assimilation where immigrants replenish the ranks but hold to American values—this too is insufficient. Christians must recover the nerve to say that Christ judges cultures, including our own.

The anxiety is real. You can hear it creeping into conversations, and you can see it in the back-and-forth on social media, in memes, and in graphs. But it gets expressed more loudly in private.

What I’m talking about is the fact that cities that used to be overwhelmingly white have changed as growing numbers of black and brown people have moved in. New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles. This demographic shift has been accompanied by a fear that something known is being replaced by something unknown.

I understand that unease. I don’t dismiss it. Nations are not abstractions. We are shaped by certain forces that endure — our habits, laws, expectations, and morals. Borders matter. Law matters. Culture matters. When that formation is absent, a nation invites strain by absorbing large numbers of people shaped by values hostile to its moral order. Abandoning assimilation creates serious problems. I stand with those who say that illegal immigration is a massive problem. It is. And its effects are never neutral.

But the new narrative of fear is misplaced. The argument, though well-meaning, is misguided. Whiteness is not what’s disappearing in America.

It is submission to Christ.

That claim requires more than assertion. It requires history.

Christianity Did Not Preserve Europe. It Corrected It.

This kind of replacement anxiety tends to assume that European (or “white”) culture provided the moral resources that once ordered the West, and that Christianity, as such, merely preserved what was already there. If that is the case, cultural survival by demographic continuity is paramount.

Fortunately, history doesn’t unfold in such a scripted manner.

It was Christianity, not whiteness, that introduced the moral framework that named brutality as sin and stripped it of legitimacy. That framework emerged in the first century, but Europe did not suddenly become morally elevated. Infanticide was common. Blood-sport remained mass entertainment for centuries. Only between the fourth and sixth centuries did public bloodsport begin to lose its claim as a mark of civilization. For crowds to gather to watch men kill one another for sport is anathema to us now. Sexual exploitation was built into the social hierarchy and rarely criticized unless it became inconvenient. The strong ruled the weak. The change was real, but it was slow.

Christianity did not come to Europe telling Europe how wonderful it was. It arrived confronting them. It drew upon ideas of Christian duty and individual liberty common to many other newborn nations. Christianity did not affirm European instincts. It disciplined them.

This distinction matters: Christianity formed the moral and intellectual vision that rightly ordered reason, law, and human dignity, and from that vision flowed derivative goods such as legal restraint, institutional stability, and concern for the weak.

Read More