“The government has now re-written the ‘safe harbor’ guidelines three times in seven months, and is evidently in no hurry to defend the HHS mandate in open court…By moving the goalposts yet again, the government managed to get Wheaton’s lawsuit dismissed on purely technical grounds. This leaves unresolved the question of religious liberty at the heart of the lawsuit.”  

A federal judge dismissed Wheaton College’s lawsuit against the Department of Health and Human Services’s new contraception mandate on Friday, after the legal challenge — among 23 others — prompted a last-minute rewrite of the mandate’s compliance deadline.

The Obama administration rewrote its “safe harbor” policy to include religious institutions, giving Wheaton and other schools one year before they must comply with the mandate.

Wheaton is considering an appeal of the lawsuit’s dismissal because “despite qualifying for the ‘safe harbor,’ not complying with the mandate during that safe harbor period technically places the college in violation of federal law,” according to the Becket Fund.

Wheaton originally filed suit against the Obama administration for a “preliminary injunction” against the HHS mandate after the school originally did not qualify for the “one-year ‘safe harbor,’ which the government offered to certain religious organizations as a temporary reprieve from the HHS mandate.”

The D.C. federal district court granted the motion to dismiss the case, stating, “Wheaton has not alleged a concrete and imminent injury.” The “safe harbor” policy revision now buys time for religious institutions to implement the mandate, which requires faith-based organizations to offer contraceptive coverage to female employees.

Read More

[Editor’s note: One or more original URLs (links) referenced in this article are no longer valid; those links have been removed.]