Banner
HomeAbout UsHow To AdvertiseLetters To The Editor
Submit Stories and ReportsPrivacy PolicyContact Us
No, the PCA isn’t a racist church, but…. Print
Opinion and Commentary
Written by Rae Whitlock   
Monday, 26 July 2010 00:00
Share/Save/Bookmark

Some background first: I love the Presbyterian Church in America.
 
I didn’t grow up in the PCA, but one could say that Presbyterianism has “haunted” me for a good while. The church I did grow up in — the Christian & Missionary Alliance — was founded by a Presbyterian minister named Albert Benjamin Simpson. Not only that, but I (quite literally) grew up in the PCA’s shadow — less than four miles away from Briarwood — in Birmingham, Alabama. Briarwood’s legendary pastor emeritus, Frank Barker, ministered to my mother as a hospital chaplain when she was fighting the cancer that eventually took her earthly life.
 
Through a series of seemingly unrelated events and circumstances, I now find myself not only a Presbyterian, but a presbyter. Some might even say it was “predestined.”
So, as I said — I love the PCA. Recent discussions and discoveries, though, have me asking if she loves me back. As a black man, I’m a rarity in this church. As a black elder, I may well be approaching unicorn-level rarity. After all, it’s pretty well-known that American Presbyterianism in general — including the PCA specifically, with its Southern roots — has historically been a white, affluent phenomenon. There’s nothing wrong with that.
 
An unfortunate holdover from those Southern roots, though, is the lingering stench — however faint or infrequently noticed — of Civil Rights-era racism.
 
Now, I’m not completely naïve. I’m not fooling myself into buying the prevailing black notion that racism is under every rock, nor am I blinded to the racism that actually does exist in individual Christians and churches — even churches with good (on paper) theology. Still, since coming into the PCA in 2005, I’ve been grieved by the number of stories I’ve heard and read — mostly from fellow elders — about the systemic racism in our church that occasionally bubbles to the surface.
 
Examples that come immediately to mind are the infiltration of members of the “League of the South” (largely regarded as a white supremacist organization) in a number of influential PCA churches, and the recent “Friendship Case” in Asheville, NC, http://bit.ly/aPz1l0 in which a pastor faced what was likely the biggest battle of his ministry after daring to call certain members of his church to repent of their racist views. I’m thankful to God that I’ve experienced none of this in my own church or presbytery.
 
Still, it’s here, and it’s real. This fact came starkly to light again when Dr. Anthony Bradley,  theology professor at The King’s College and a PCA member, recently wrote on Peter Slade’s Open Friendship in a Close Society - a book that Bradley purports to discuss the “racist and pro-segregationist ethos” surrounding the formation of the PCA. This ethos apparently still remains in some corners.
 
Admittedly, I haven’t yet read Slade’s book (though I now plan to), this raises another question in my mind.
 
That question is “what?!” Not the “I-didn’t-quite-understand-that” type of “what,” but the incredulous, “what-is-wrong-with-you” type of “what” that Paul blurted out under the Holy Spirit’s inspiration in his first missive to the Corinthians. This has been sitting and stinking for too long.  The PCA tried its hand at collective repentance with a statement issued by the 30th General Assembly in 2002, but it was so general (less than 200 words) that I don’t know that it was helpful.
 
Our own Westminster Confession of Faith points to the need for specificity in our repentance (WCF XV.5). Can you imagine Paul only confessing that he “formerly did some bad stuff to the church, but I received mercy”?  By no means!  He laid out his sins specifically. He didn’t mince words with himself and acknowledged that he was a “blasphemer, a persecutor, and an insolent opponent.” There is nothing general about that! Where are the faithful men, specifically and publicly repenting of their specific, personal sins and being reconciled to their red, yellow, black, and white brothers?
 
Where are the public calls for this repentance? Why are we so often satisfied to look the other way?
 
Fathers and brothers, if you are among those who harbor racist attitudes in your heart, be warned: GA doesn’t have you covered. A general statement from the PCA is not the same as personal repentance. I call you — as a fellow elder in this church — to repent of your sin and then to be reconciled to your brothers. If you are not guilty of this, but choose to look the other way, then I urge you to repent of your apathy and join me in this call.
 
Like Bradley, I am reformed and Presbyterian for reasons that have nothing to do with the South, with segregation. Like Bradley, I love the PCA. Like Bradley, sometimes I falter and start wondering if this is where I really belong, but then I remember why I’m here. Despite her warts — and what church has no warts — the PCA is “faithful to the Scriptures, true to the Reformed faith, and obedient to the Great Commission of Jesus Christ.”  That’s a church I want to be part of, a church I will raise my family in, and a church I’m called to help lead.
 
Semper reformanda.
 
Rae Whitlock is a husband and a daddy who happens to serve as a ruling elder at Grace Central Presbyterian Church (PCA) in Columbus, OH. He manages social media and web strategy for a Christian non-profit organization as a "day job". This article comes from the Vintage 1973 blog http://vintage73.com/2010/07/no-the-pca-isnt-a-racist-church-but/ and is used with his permission.
 
 

Comments (10)add
0
Great article, Rae
written by Mason , July 26, 2010
Great article, Rae! I haven't seen much outright, flagrant racism in the PCA, but undoubtedly it does exist in some places, as you rightly point out.

Leaving racism aside for a minute though, why do you think there are so few African-American men ordained in the PCA? As you know, Briarwood has been very aggressive in reaching out to inner city (ie, African-American) people, and has planted churches in predominantly black areas of Birmingham. Even so, these churches - to the degree that have grown - are still largely white. I'd be interested to hear your thoughts on why this is, and what - if anything - can be done to change the lack of diversity in the PCA...
0
...
written by rwoodward , July 26, 2010
I'm not so sure that I see "racism" as a Biblical sin(similar to "homophobia" which is concidered a sin by our culture), but as a cultural sin. I'd say that "Pride" can indeed be a sin(as found in the scriptures. I think we need to be very careful about adopting the "world's sins" and focus more on what the Scriptures and confessions teach us.
I was involved in the Friendship case here in NC and what I saw had more to do with several individual's beliefs regarding demographics and IQ testing not undue pride. These are extremely contested issues with scholars and good people on both sides- by no means settled science as many proclaim and yet a pastor(Craig Bulkeley) tore a church apart because some members had the audacity to actually practice their liberty as Christians to express a sympathy for an extra-Biblical viewpoint.
These conversations about racism need to be conducted carefully and in a sane manner as in today's culture accusations of "racism" have become somewhat too numerous to be taken seriously- it's becomelike the last refuge for a scoundrel.
0
Pastor
written by Reed DePace , July 27, 2010
Mr. (?) Woodward, your opinion is that racism was not the issue in that church? What did the elders of that church and Presbytery conclude? That it was?

Rae, thank you for your comments. As a pastor in the heart of the Deep South I am very much attuned to this issue. I pray regularly for wisdom, both to repent and to help others move forward in the grace of Christ that has welcomed some from all families.
0
Racism is a 6th commandment issue
written by Mason , July 27, 2010
rwoodward -

Racism is a 6th commandment violation. All humans are created in the image of God. To view a race as inferior is to believe they are created less in the image of God than other races. To diminish another human's standing as a person created in God's image is a violation of the 6th commandment. Thus racism is, above all, a 6th commandment violation. Pastor Bulkeley's actions were correct.
0
...
written by Rae Whitlock , July 27, 2010
Mr. Woodward,

Thank you for your comment. I'm in agreement with Mason here -- racism is a violation of the sixth commandment. Even if we afforded the word "racism" with the most charitable possible definition (the belief that there are distinctive cultural and hereditary differences among ethnicities that make some superior to others), such a belief inevitably leads to a dehumanizing hatred of those ethnicities deemed "inferior." Scripture and the Westminster Standards (WLC 136) clearly tell us that such hatred is sin. I'd say the same for "homophobia", if that's defined as a hatred for homosexual persons (but not if it's defined as the belief that homosexual practice is sinful, of course).

I agree that we need to take care to not conflate "sins" that are merely cultural with those that are truly biblical -- but we should also take that same care to realize that there is often overlap.
0
sinner
written by Kirk D. Lyons , August 03, 2010
The evil of the friendship case was that the pastor used "racism" asthe excuse to rouse the presbytery/community against his session and more than half his active congregation. The issue was one of church government, and an overpaid ($70K/yr)minister with a failing ministry. Rather than confront his own shortcomings as a minister, he chose to play the race card in a showdown that involved church government: does the Ruling Elders rule or is the Teaching elder supreme - well friendship got an answer and withthe help of parishioners who hadn't been in church in years, the entire session was sacked. The resulting fight at presbytery convinces me that the rule of presbyters has no advantage over the rule of bishops - both are equally corruptible.
0
...
written by rwoodward , August 04, 2010
Reed, Racism was the Presbytery's named focus on the Friendship case, but as one directly involved I can state without opinion that this was not at the heart of it- the whole issue revolved around Christian liberty(which the pastor- Craig Bulkeley doesn't seem to believe in based on his non-answers to me and published writings). The pastor and his session differered on how to approach an elder whose views were somewhat politically incorrect and that the pastor disagreed with. A Shepherding committe found that while they disagreed with his views that they were within his liberty as a Christian to hold(and that he ought to be careful, as an elder, expressing them). To make a very long story short, this wasn't good enough for the pastor and so he went into a childish fit, put on his lawyer's robe, and apparently got the SPLC's attention screaming "racist, racist" kinda like the left is doing now with anyone who happens to oppose Obama. The rest is just a bunch of political wrangling unbefiting of Christ's church.
see also my comment to Rae
0
...
written by rwoodward , August 04, 2010
Rae, thanks for the feedback, but I disagree with you. I don't see where it's sinful for someone to believe that there may be differences between the "races". I don't really even know if there is such a thing as "race". Some say yes, others no. A study was just released from Duke university that suggested that there are differences between people groups(the study didn't use the word "race" because, as the authors stated it would be too volitol) in terms of certain athletic competitions. My point is that the Scriptures don't address these kind of things. You made mention that it's inevitable that believing in differences leads to superiority or hatred- I disagree again. Too many people are quick to attribute evil to psychology or mental processes. This in itself is an unbiblical idea. Also, this "stepping stone that leads to sin" is rediculous in that if taken to it's logical extreme it'd be a sin for all of us men to NOT pluck out our eyes so as not to lust at women, because as we all know, with eyes we might see and enevitably lust after women.
Also, many critical of "our side"(I was directly involved in the Friendship case) sought to paint us as those who didn't believe that "other races" were made in the image of God. This is silly. We all completely reject this as great sin. Two out of about 30 adults and children believed that IQ testing showed differences in intelligence among the "races" and the rest of us defended their right(Christian Liberty) to hold these beliefs so long as the scriptures were silent(as in the age of the earth debate). I myself didn't believe in races and thought that this was due to problems with the tests, bias, methodology, etc... but have come to see that it is all a real controversy with no clear verdict. Because of this I believe that if one doesn't hate another group or "race", but simply beleives that there may be differences among them then and if the scriptures don't prohibit it, this belief is fine.

0
...
written by rwoodward , August 04, 2010
Rae, I DO have a real problem when one seeks to make others conform to his "private beliefs" or politically correct notions as did Pastor Craig Bulkeley. The Presbytery's own Shepherding committee found that while they didn't share the beliefs of our elder( who held the "racist" views) and cautioned against him sharing them that they were, after all, within his Christian liberty to hold. This wasn't good enough for Bulkeley. Imagine your session excommunicating a member because he happened to believe in an "old earth" or thought only adults ought to be baptised. Bulkeley would have you believe that they were removed for other reasons, but the evidence shows otherwise.
Anyway, once again thx for the comments. I'm an open minded man who always appreciates one who knows the scriptures better than I and enjoy conversations of this type(as I know too little) so please don't hesitate to e-mail me if I'm mistaken on any point.
Your brother
0
...
written by rwoodward , August 04, 2010
Mason,
Please see my comments to Rae. You've made a fundamnetal error in assuming too much.
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comments.

busy
Last Updated on Monday, 26 July 2010 13:29